Current page:

Home

/

Case

/

316 vs 304 Stainless Steel Screws: Which is Better for Your Optical Equipment?

Case

Contact Us

Tel:

+86 13143444311

Email:sst@szsst88.com

Fax:+0086-755-27322278

Address:Building 9, First Industrial Zone, Tantou Industrial City, Songgang Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen 518105, Guangdong, China

316 vs 304 Stainless Steel Screws: Which is Better for Your Optical Equipment?

When selecting screws for optical equipment, manufacturers often face the choice between 304 stainless steel screws and 316 stainless steel screws. This decision can significantly impact equipment performance, durability, and cost. In this article, we explore a real-world case study of a German optical equipment manufacturer who faced contamination issues with 304 screws and how we helped them solve it. We also compare 304 and 316 screws to help you make an informed choice.

stainless steel screws

The Problem: 304 Stainless Steel Screws as a Contamination Source

Mr. Zhao, a German optical equipment manufacturer, initially used 304 stainless steel screws throughout his precision optical devices. While 304 screws are cost-effective and corrosion-resistant for general applications, they caused unexpected issues over time. Prolonged use led to nickel and chromium precipitation on the screw surfaces, contaminating the optical coatings. This was particularly problematic in areas directly contacting optical components or exposed to frequent cleaning with solvents like alcohol or isopropyl alcohol, as it affected imaging precision.

Why Did This Happen?

304 stainless steel contains 18% chromium and 8% nickel, offering good corrosion resistance for general use. However, it lacks molybdenum, making it less resistant to aggressive solvents and prolonged exposure to harsh environments. Over time, surface corrosion can lead to ion precipitation, which is detrimental in precision applications like optical equipment.

The Solution: Switching to 316 Stainless Steel Screws for Critical Components

To address Mr. Zhao’s issue, our team recommended transitioning to 316 stainless steel screws for critical components. Here’s why:

For non-precision components, such as equipment housings, we advised retaining 304 screws to optimize costs, with a recommendation to inspect for corrosion every six months.

Outcome

By strategically using 316 screws in areas directly contacting optical components or exposed to cleaning agents, Mr. Zhao’s equipment maintained imaging precision and extended service life. The hybrid approach of using 304 screws for non-critical parts kept production costs manageable.

custom small stainless steel screw

304 vs 316 Stainless Steel Screws: A Detailed Comparison

To help you decide which screw is best for your application, here’s a comparison of 304 and 316 stainless steel screws:

Feature

304 Stainless Steel Screws

316 Stainless Steel Screws

Composition

18% Chromium, 8% Nickel

16% Chromium, 10% Nickel, 2-3% Molybdenum

Corrosion Resistance

Good for general use

Superior, especially against solvents

Magnetic Properties

Slightly magnetic

Non-magnetic

Cost

More cost-effective

Higher cost due to molybdenum

Best Use Case

Non-precision components, equipment housings

Precision components, solvent-exposed parts

Ion Precipitation Risk

Moderate, may leach nickel/chromium

None, ideal for optical applications

When to Use 304 Stainless Steel Screws

When to Use 316 Stainless Steel Screws

How We Can Help You Choose the Right Screws

Selecting the right stainless steel screws depends on your specific application, budget, and performance requirements. Our team specializes in custom screw solutions for optical and precision manufacturing industries. We offer:

screw supplier

Call to Action

Need custom screws for your optical equipment? Contact us today to discuss your requirements and get a tailored solution that ensures precision and durability.

7 月-12-2025

kalyn